Written by Andy | 30 January 2011

As it stands right now, the Cardinals have two options when it comes to Albert Pujols:

1) Sign him to a contract that will cripple their payroll for the next ten years.

2) Allow him to become a free agent and watch the best player in baseball walk away, leaving the franchise in ruins and getting nothing in return but a couple of draft picks.

Understandably, Cardinals GM Kevin Towers is not a big fan of either of those options.  In fact, both of those options probably make him want to give up baseball, move to Saudi Arabia, and open a liquor store.  In other words, do something more likely to result in success than being general manager of the Cardinals.

(Note: I know Towers is not the Cardinals' GM but we have a running joke that whenever we talk about a GM and we can't remember immediately what his name is, we just assume it's Kevin Towers.  Or Walt Jocketty.  But if I had said "Cardinals GM Walt Jocketty" you would have thought I just hadn't been paying attention when he left the Cardinals to go to the Reds recently where he replaced Kevin Towers.)

Of course, there is a 3rd option.

3) Trade Albert Pujols. 

Unfortunately, that conversation went something like this:

Cardinals:  Albert, we're going to trade you.  We can't afford you and we can't let you go for nothing.  I'm sure you'll understand.
Pujols:  Sure, that's fine.  I'm fine with it.
Cardinals: (hopefully)  Really? 
Pujols:  No.
Cardinals:  Chicago is beautiful in the summer...
Pujols:  No.

And that's not surprising.  After all, Pujols is best served by the Cardinals being screwed.  He wants St. Louis to either be desperate and pay him more than he would otherwise get, or he wants them to at least be participating in pursuing him to drive up other teams' offers.  He also probably wants to stay in St. Louis if all else were equal.  If the Cardinals trade him and can then walk away from him but still feel good about whatever they got in the trade, that just means one less team to negotiate with next fall.

Which brings us to the Giants.  Thank God we're not the Cardinals.

Unlike St. Louis, the Giants have talent distributed throughout the roster.  Our success in the near future will be built around a core of young players, most of whom will be under contract cheap for a long time to come.  Cain reaches free agency the same year Rowand comes off the books.  Timmy will be a free agent the year Zito comes off the books.  In the meantime, we'll be able to shed some of the inflated contracts still in our midst, including Tejada, DeRosa, F. Sanchez, etc.  Belt will be cheap and Huff can take an outfield spot.  The money is there to keep the players we need long term.  If, God forbid, Lincecum were to walk, we would still have a hypothetical starting rotation of Cain, Sanchez, Bumgarner, Wheeler, and Surkamp.  If Wilson walks, we can find another closer for less money.  Torres is here until 2013 at least.  Etc. etc.

Offensively, our future is built around the notion that Posey, Belt, and Sandoval will be a 3-4-5 combo for the next decade.  It's an attractive proposition if Pablo can regain his 2009 form.  The good news about Posey is that catchers, always fearful of injury, are more likely to sign slightly discounted long-term contracts with their home team before they reach free agency.  The bad news is that Posey, Bumgarner, Belt, and Cain might start wondering why there isn't more good BBQ in the Bay Area.  And why everything is so damn expensive.  And why it's so hard to find a place to hunt.  And why all the bloggers make repeated tired stereotypes of southern living.

But the bottom line is that the Giants are in a pretty good place.  They won a championship despite the fact that Rowand, Zito, DeRosa, and Renteria made a combined $48.1 million.  In fact, those were four of our five highest paid players last year.  That makes me want to lie down and stare at the ceiling for a while.  And keep in mind, I have a really boring ceiling.  It's just, like, white.

How successful we are in the post-Zito/Rowand era will depend on who wins conversations between Brian Sabean and Brian Sabean.

Brian Sabean:  Oooh.  I could lure Gil Meche out of retirement.
Brian Sabean:  But he's 46 and has one working elbow.
Brian Sabean:  You're right.  We'll never outbid the Yankees.  Is Bartolo Colon still alive?

Our future is now, and that's cool.  But our future is also our future.  Good time to be a Giants fan.  Good time to be Albert Pujols.  Bad time to be Kevin Towers.

no comments

Written by Andy | 30 January 2011

As it turns out, Eric Surkamp is not only a pretty good pitcher, he's also not dumb.

Today I asked him the following question on Twitter.

Wait, back up.

My wife informs me that if I keep starting sentences with "so, today on Twitter," people are going to stop listening to me.  Instead, she suggested that anytime something happens on Twitter, I just say it happened on "BART" and she'll know what I mean but everyone else will think I'm not a big loser, that is until they hear me spend thirty minutes speaking eloquently on the profound heroism of Severus Snape.


Eric Surkamp and I were on BART and I asked him the following question:

"Eric: If Brandon Belt hit only against you for a season, what would his batting average be?"

I encouraged him to answer honestly on the grounds that "nobody reads twitter," but this was his response:

"Why don't you ask him what my ERA would be?"


The good news is that I got to have this great image of Surkamp pitching to Belt, there's a base hit to right, and Belt runs to the bag, steps on it, and then jogs back to home to hit again while saying: "ghost runner on first."

Baseball is the best.

no comments

Written by Andy | 29 January 2011

This picture showed up in my inbox today.

I think he's found that middle ground where he's thin enough to field ground balls not hit directly at him but round enough to still be called Kung Fu Panda.

No more, Pablo.  You're good just like that.  From now on, you eat carrots for breakfast, twinkies for lunch, and a sensible meal for dinner.  That should keep your weight steady.

Apologies to anyone hoping to find shirtless pictures of Buster Posey on this blog.  I only do one shirtless male picture per year.  Wait, that came out wrong.  Let me clarify.  This is the only picture I will post all year of anybody of either gender not wearing a shirt.

I'm going to go now.  I have to, um, vacuum my, uh, cat. 

no comments

Written by Andy | 28 January 2011

As it turns out, we don’t just talk about VORP so we can say “VORG” and “VORBD” and kiss-up to our wife by telling everyone what a high VORW she has. But she really does. If her VORW were a Giant, it’d be Tim Lincecum if you know what I…never mind. I thought it might be interesting to look at the VORP’s of last year’s Giants and talk about what it all means for the 2011 Giants.

2010 Giants VORP
Huff: 48.9
Torres: 32.7
Posey: 32.5
Uribe: 20.2
Burrell: 19.4
Sanchez: 18.2
Sandoval: 14.7
Renteria: 9.8
Ross: 3.5 (playoffs not included)
Ishikawa: 1.9
Whiteside: 1.3
Molina: 0.6
Guillen: -0.3
Fontenot: -0.9
Rowand: -1.6
Bowker: -3.0
Schierholtz: -3.9
DeRosa: -6.9

We added:
Tejada: 12.1
Belt: 18 bajillion
Turns out it’s hard to track down VORP for minor leaguers. If anyone can find out just how high Brandon Belt’s VORP was, please let me know. In the meantime, I can tell you that his OPS was 1.075.

Obviously the biggest concern is replacing Uribe’s production and the projected “regression to mean” of Huff and Torres.

The response to that concern is to rationally point out that for the love of God, Sabean and Bochy gave a combined 1,163 at bats to six players with an average VORP of negative 2.5 and that if they ever did that again, bless their hearts, world series championship or not, we will attack them with shovels.

In seriousness, the big gains stand to come from:
-Sandoval returning to form (he’s already got a really big VORKFP and now he’s got a smaller stomach too)
-Ross finding some kind of happy medium between the suckfest of his September and the absurdity of his October.
-Brandon Belt existing
-In case the stats above didn't make it clear, Buster Posey is better than Bengie Molina.  So that will help in April and May.
-Brandon Belt will be here! 
-Schierholtz should do less hitting this year and more playing right field in the 9th inning.  You know why?
-Brandon Belt will be around and might, you know, do some hitting

I'm sorry, but I walk away from these stats and this offseason feeling optimistic.  I know Huff and Torres might regress and losing Uribe could hurt.  But it just feels like there's more here this year than there was last year, particularly if we're more efficient in how we assign at-bats.  I mean, giving Bengie Molina a couple hundred of Buster Posey's at-bats would be like giving Joe Martinez a month or so of Timmy's starts.  It's not 2009 when our 8th best hitter was a pitcher.  We've got the talent.  We just have to...what's that?  You don't believe me?  Remember when things were bad?  It wasn't that long ago.

From all of us at 24 Days of Magic, have a great weekend.

Behold.  The 2009 San Francisco Giants.
Sandoval: 64.2
Uribe:  25.7
Rowand 13.1
Torres: 12.2
Molina: 12.0
Lewis: 5.2
Velez:  2.7
Cain: 1.9

no comments

Written by Andy | 28 January 2011

If I was a character on The Office, I think I'd be Jim (every guy says that because the alternatives are horrid).  Sometimes, in my less dignified moments, I'm Michael.  Today, however, I was Dwight.

(Igor would like me to remind everyone that The Office is a registered trademark of NBC which is owned by Comcast Inc. which in turn is an affiliate of General Electric which is a subsidiary of the private equity firm Manchurian Global.)

See, the good folks over at The Nats Blog are doing a feature in which they chat with bloggers from all 29 other teams to get their perspective on the upcoming season.  And I volunteered to do the Giants preview.

But then I thought...this is kind of suspicious.   Why are they asking me all these questions?  Are they pulling a Pat Riley and Dwyane Wade and spying on the rest of the league?

I mean, if the CIA had a team....stands to reason....

Never fear, Giants fans.  Much like our bearded mental assassin, I was ninja.  Below is a sample of the Q & A.

Q: How do you feel about the 2011 team?

Uh....Rob Neyer says we're going to finish 3rd.  We think that's about right.  I mean, you should check out the Dodgers.  They're really good.  They have Casey Blake.  Have you talked to them yet?  You should talk to them.  And the Padres have more Hairstons than us.  it's an uphill climb, for sure.

Q:  What was the best move the Giants made this offseason?

Probably trading Huff to the Pirates and Posey to the Cardinals.  That frees up some cap space.  We also feel good about the four injured Mets we acquired for Matt Cain.  Cain never really won a lot of games, you know, and wins are a great measure of pitching talent.  So when the Queens hospital called, it was really an easy decision. 

Q:  Are you excited about the prospect of Brandon Belt joining the team?


Brandon Belt.

Dan Ortmeier?

Belt...he's a AAA 1st baseman who could make the majors this year.

Oh yes, him.  He broke his head.  Out for the year.  Tragic, um, gas-pumping accident. 

Q:  What's your projection for the lineup this year?

Rowand, Molina, Zito, Garko, Dave Roberts, Benard, Alex Smith, and then maybe lure Shawon Dunston out of retirement.  

Q:  What is Timmy's dog named?

Bob.  Bobert.  I think Bobert.  (twiddles thumbs nervously)


After that he asked me some questions about what it was like to be a Giants fan last year and I told him how wonderful and relaxing it was, how truly enjoyable the whole experience was for us fans. 

Of course, if he watches our opening day game against the Dodgers, he'll know I was lying.  But by then we'll be 1-0 and it'll be too late to stop us.  

Can we start the season now?

no comments

Written by Andy | 27 January 2011

The first time I ever read a Giants blog was when my friend emailed me this article back in the summer.  It was also the first time I’d thought about the Giants and laughed in a very long time.  Usually I cried.  Or punched something.  Or both.

Later, when I decided to start my own blog, I was told that I must approach Grant of McCovey Chronicles for permission, as he was the BlogFather.  I did so in mid-November and found him sitting in his office talking with his consigliore, Brian Bocock.

“BlogFather,” I said.  “I would like to start a blog.”

“Yes, yes,” he replied.  “I can see you are eager.  First, let me ask you a question.  Who sucks more, Ryan Garko or…”

“Ryan Garko,” I said.  “Nobody sucks more than him.”

“I am disturbed that you have interrupted me but you have certainly answered correctly.  I will allow you to start your blog, but you must give it a stupid name.”

“Yes, BlogFather.”

“You may go.”

“Thank you, BlogFather.  May your first child be a masculine child and may you name him a masculine name like Madison.”

Fast forward to December…

You know how when reporters talk to athletes it’s an “interview” unless it happens on Sunday night and Bob Lee is the reporter in which case it becomes a “conversation”?  Isn’t that weird?

Anyway, Grant was nice enough to have a “conversation” with me.  It was a Sunday night and we both wore sweaters and sat down in plush armchairs in a room lined with bookshelves.  It was very pleasant.

24D:  Thanks for doing this interview.  For those who don't know, Grant runs "McCovey Chronicles," a fantastic Giants blog (www.mccoveychronicles.com).  His website is linked to on Yahoo Sports and all that.  Buster Posey routinely texts him for driving directions.   So, how did that happen for you?  Are you now incredibly wealthy as a result?

MCC:  I started my first site, Waiting for Boof, after the 2002 World Series. There were really only two Giantscentric blogs then -- Only Baseball Matters and The Southpaw -- so it was pretty wide open. My goal was just to practice my writing -- I fancied myself a screenwriter, but I didn't write nearly enough as I needed to if I wanted to accomplish anything. But whenever I was on the internet discussing the Giants, I figured out that I could rip off 1000 words about the Giants like it was nothing.

When SB Nation started almost six years ago, I was the first blog other than Athletics Nation. SBN's software and partnerships are the biggest reason for the site's growth, really. My knock-knock jokes are cute, but that's only going to go so far. Auto-refreshing comments, reader participation, and Yahoo!/SI.com visibility are what keep people coming in and coming back. The move also forced me to write every day, which is a discipline I didn't know I had.

24D:  My least favorite knock-knock joke is:  Knock Knock:  Who's There?  Eric Hinske.   That's the whole joke.  Anyway, as your blog has taken off, have you gotten any support or recognition from the team itself?  Have you had the opportunity to interview players or coaches? 

MCC:  Hinske's down the mountain when the fox is chasing her in the snow? Yeah, you're probably right.

The organization has reached out to me on a couple different occasions, and they've been supportive. I think they were a little worried that I'd be a fist-in-the-air blogger, fighting for press access and the ability to ask Bruce Bochy why he double-switched in the ninth inning. When I told them that I preferred to do my thing from my mother's basement -- call me when they get Bagel Bites brought down the stairs with love in the post-game spread -- they were probably a little relieved.

That's not my thing. I think it's better if I solely write from a fan/outsider perspective. That's the only way I can be effective. If I had a press pass to get clubhouse quotes and inside information, I'd just be doubling up what Extra Baggs does, and he would do it much better.

That definitely goes for player/coach interviews, too. When I find out that Aaron Rowand is a really nice guy, maybe I'm less likely to write something satirical about him. Because, really, that's a guy's livelihood I’m  writing about. He struggled through a lot professionally last season, so the last thing he needs is to give time to some clown with a blog that pokes fun at him. But if I stay an anonymous nerd and he stays an image on my TV screen, our arrangement works just fine, and I can write the best content I know how.

24D:  That makes sense, especially the bagel bites part.  Maybe that's why Randy Moss threw that tantrum when he saw the post-game Vikings spread...no bagel bites.  So, speaking of that fan/outsider perspective...as a Giants fan, have you been able to process what just happened this past year?  Do you still wake up in the middle of the night screaming in horror about Scott Speizio and then go "wait...but..."?

MCC:  I haven't been able to fully process the World Series. Starting to, but still not there yet. After popping the champagne and jumping around, I sat down to write...and just stared. I had absolutely no idea what to write, and after about an hour, I posted what might be the most boring thing I've ever written -- and that's saying a lot. I couldn't put my thoughts into written words.

24DNow that a little time has elapsed, have you found it easier to write about the title?

MCC:  A little bit. It's tough to maintain the same edge in a lot of ways. It was so, so easy to rail against something completely esoteric, if not meaningless, like Eli Whiteside over Steve Holm because the San Francisco Giants had never won the World Series. Jose Vizcaino playing innings at first base? Why, that's the end of the world because the San Francisco Giants had never won the World Series. Bruce Bochy being weird when it came to giving Buster Posey playing time? Unacceptable, because if the Giants are ever going to win the World Series (yeah, right), it will be on the backs of young players like Posey.

Now? Just about every decision Bochy made in the postseason worked out to the Giants' benefit, so am I really going to get fired up about him bringing Ramon Ramirez into a tie game, or something like that? The same goes for Sabean -- if you want to remain cynical, you can. There's roster ammunition there. But what's the point right now?

Time will take care of this contented feeling, I'm sure. It's not like I watch the Niners and say, gee, that's okay because I have such fond memories of watching Super Bowl XXIX in my dorm room. And I still think that Sabean is the kind of talent evaluator who believes Jose Guillen is a nice complementary piece to a major league lineup, which is to say the kind of talent evaluator with whom I will often disagree, so it will all come back at some point. It'll be like riding a bike.

24D:  Single best offseason move?  And single worst?

MCC:  Best move? That's tough because it's a close race. Pat Burrell is barely making more than the minimum, so that's an obvious contender, but Eugenio Velez is operating under deep cover as a Dodger now. I guess I'll stay positive and go with Burrell, but it's close.

Worst move is a big N/A. They didn't do anything outlandish at all. I can see the justifications behind Tejada and Mota, even if those might not have been the exact players I would have picked.

24D:  Alright, last question:  Based on a recent tweet and not on any weird internet stalking I understand that you're married.  How did that Fever-Pitch-esque conversation with your wife go when you first started dating, you know, the one that starts:

"So, there's something you should know about me."


"I really like the Giants."

"That's great!  So do I!"

"No, you don't understand.  I, like, REALLY like the Giants..."

MCC:  We were roommates before my nerdy hotness pulled her in like a tractor beam. So she was well aware how deep I was in. The first year we were dating was the first year Pac Bell Park opened, and I went to about 50 games.

The first time I ever went away with her family was on a houseboat trip, and it was during the 2000 playoffs. I tried to play it cool so her family didn't think I was a freak, but I ended up on the top of the houseboat, alone, listening to 13 innings of torture on the radio, only to have Benny Agbayani ruin it all. And then I had to re-enter society, answering all of the well-meaning "Did they win?" questions.

I drank a lot that night.

no comments

Written by Andy | 26 January 2011

Our very own (ok, that sounds weird, but you know what we mean) Eric Surkamp was rated the #2 pitching prospect in the Giants' farm system by Baseball America.

Eric was also rated as having the best changeup, curveball, and control of any pitcher in the system. 

Now is the best time to join the Eric Surkamp fan club

Now is the worst time to join the Jay Cutler fan club.

Now would be a pretty good time to join the Timmy's Dog fan club, if it existed.  Yesterday my wife asked: "who takes care of the dog when the Giants are on the road?"

I'm raising my hand. 

no comments

Written by Andy | 26 January 2011

I'm hoping to post a couple different things later on today.

Posts with "substance" to live up to the comment that Grant at McCovey Chronicles made about our interview with Eric Surkamp being "actual substance."

Don't worry, Grant.  Mostly we're going to be posting fake conversations between ourselves and our fictional personal assistant Igor.  And making up non-flattering nicknames for Mat Latos.

In the meantime....

This video is awesome.


no comments

Written by Andy | 25 January 2011

I love advanced baseball statistics.  To me, the Bill James crowd are geniuses who have taken the most beautiful form of entertainment and competition ever created and added common sense to the way in which it is watched.  There's one Giant (pun intended) problem with these stats, though, and that would be sentences like this:
"You may think Albert Pujols is better than Ben Zobrist, but you're just a dumb-as-a-stick know-nothing RBI-lover.  The fact is, Zobrist's VORP and WAR numbers, set as a logarithm to reveal expected wins or losses and combined with UZR and other advanced prognosticatorial projections related to anticipated values of defensive range adjusted for park demonstrate a BABIP that steeps heavily toward the conclusion that Ben Zobrist is in fact the greatest baseball player ever.  Pujols.  Please.  Go back to your cave."
The problem with sentences like these is that they leave the traditional baseball fan feeling like:
a) I've just been called stupid
b) I have to be a geek to truly understand baseball
c) I don't even believe this because there's no way Ben Zobrist is better than Albert Pujols
My goal is to start a segment here at 24 Days of Magic that turns these complicated advanced stats into something tangible that we can relate to every day life so that all fans can use them comfortably.  Because they are better.  But you shouldn't have to be a geek with a superiority complex to believe that.
The inspiration came on a sunny day back in October as I had lunch with my friend Jon.
Me:  Yeah, and she's watching the baby tonight so I can go to the playoff game.
Jon:  That's awesome of her.
Me:  I know.  Her VORW is so high right now...
Jon:  Her what?
Me:  Her VORW.  Value Over Replacement Wife.
Allow me to explain:
WHAT VORP STANDS FOR:  Value Over Replacement Player
WHAT VORP MEASURES:  How many runs a player produces as opposed to a replacement player that is defined roughly as a player at 80% of the league average in run production.
HOW VORP WORKS:  The idea behind VORP is that in the end, the stat that matters the most for hitters is how many runs they produce per out.  But rather than just assign a number based on stats, VORP attempts to measure a player's value by comparing it to the value of a mythical replacement player who has the same percentage of the team's at-bats. 
WHO IS THIS REPLACEMENT PLAYER?  The replacement player is the kind of player you'd get if your starter gets injured.  In most cases, you don't have an "average" player on the bench.  In the majors, average players are starters.  The backup is usually a guy who is below average and who could be picked up on a waiver wire, traded for bad prospects, etc. 
So how can we correlate this to the real world?
VORW!  Or VORG, if you're not married.  Or VORB or VORH if you're female.  Or VORBD (Value Over Replacement Baby-Daddy).  Think about it like this...
You're in a relationship that ends and you're suddenly single.  Life is great until you realize you're a complete emotional/physical/gastronomical mess without your boyfriend/girlfriend and you need to get back into a relationship RIGHT NOW.  The replacement boyfriend or girlfriend you find is not going to be "average."  He or she is going to be the kind of boyfriend/girlfriend you find quickly because, "hey, they're not ugly" or "we both like food" or "he hasn't been arrested in months."  It's a quick fix.  It's the best you can do.  It's (I'm so, so sorry) the Eugenio Velez of dating.
WHAT'S A GOOD VORP?  Last year, Albert Pujols led the league at 81.8, which means he produced 81.8 more runs over the course of the year than the Replacement Player.  Aubrey Huff led the Giants at 48.9.  Barry Bonds in 2001 put up a VORP of 145.1.
CAN YOU GET A NEGATIVE VORP?  Yes.  Neifi Perez in 2002 had a -27.4 VORP.  Which is payback for that homerun he hit in 1998 against the Giants.
-Your wife watches the baby so you can go watch Timmy strike out 14 Braves even though she'd been watching the baby all day:  96 VORW
-Your boyfriend pretends to forget your birthday so he can lull you into being surprised by a fancy dinner and flies your best friend in from across the country to see you:  86.4 VORB
-Your girlfriend walks around wearing a Buster Posey shirt and can tell you his OBP:  65.9 VORG
-Your husband walks around wearing no shirt and wiping orange Cheeto dust on his stomach: 8.1 VORH
-Your girlfriend says things like "baseball is so boring."  1.9 VORG
-Your boyfriend says things like "you're so boring."  -8.7 VORB
-Your baby daddy is running for president and slept with you while his wife was battling cancer.  -22.7 VORBD
Which means Neifi Perez must have had a REALLY bad year.
Why are you writing this post?
Two reasons.
First, I want to help make VORP an understandable concept.

But more importantly, it's my goal to one day walk down the street and hear people saying: "OMG, he claimed his phone died but then I saw him texting like two minutes later and I know he was texting that hussy.  His VORB is like negative 3 billion."
no comments

Written by Andy | 24 January 2011

We continue our preview of each division with a look at the AL West.  Remember that projected improvement is denoted with a "Spiffy Buster" and projected regression is denoted with an "Angry Brian."  Why wasn't I invited to Buster Posey's wedding?  I'm still doing some soul searching to figure that out.  After all, I'm friends with Brandon Belt on facebook and he's friends with somebody who is friends with somebody who is friends with Kevin Bacon.  So I should be right there.  Weird.

Teams Listed In Order of Projected Finish
2010 Finish: 2nd
2010 Record: 81-81
2010 Pythagorean (roughly the record they would have had with neutral luck): 86-76
2011 Projection: 90-72
Difference: 9 Spiffy Busters
There are four kinds of Giants fans when it comes to the A's.  Type 1 wears those silly Giants/A's split hats and has a crush on Ray Fosse.  Type 2 considers the A's to be their 2nd favorite team, but a distant 2nd.  Type 3 hates the A's and wants them to move to Vegas.  Type 4 goes weeks without realizing the A's exist.

Personally, I have the most respect for Type 2 and Type 3.  I'm Type 2 but I'd be Type 3 before I'd be Type 1.

Anyway, the A's got very unlucky last year, have the best pitching outside of any team that participated in last year's NLCS, and added enough offense to make a difference. The dirty little secret that Billy Beane doesn't want you to know is that Cust for Matsui is actually a downgrade in statistical productivity, but an upgrade in selling tickets.  Still, DeJesus is a legit hitter, Willingham will help, some of the young guys will get better, and Dallas Braden's grandma will bat 8th.  Should make the playoffs an interesting time in the Bay Area.
(I can't believe I just said that.  Somebody should slap me.  One world championship and I lose all sense of appropriate non-jinxing protocol.)

2. 2010 World Champion Runners-Up TEXAS RANGERS
2010 Finish: 1st
2010 Record: 90-72
2010 Pythagorean: 92-70
2011 Projection: 89-73
Difference: 1 Angry Brian

When you've got a great offense but really only one star pitcher, a couple decent starters, and then you have Tommy Hunter pitching an actual World Series game, you should probably make pitching a priority in the off-season.  Well, despite the fact that Ranger management took Cliff Lee hunting, bought him camo Ranger jerseys, and took his wife to Wal-Mart and told her to "go nuts," the Cliffster is gone, to be replaced by Brandon Webb and his fun and exciting right arm.  Adrian Beltre?  Sure.  Fine.  If you thought Nolan Ryan looked pissed off during the Series, wait till you see him this year as his team plays 10-9 games 4 times a week, wins about half of them, and fails to make the playoffs because they can't beat Gio Gonzalez.
(Side note:  how fun was it to watch Barbara Bush knitting while Madison Bumgarner was killing it?  My wife yelled: "she's knitting!" and I didn't believe her at first, but yes, she was in fact knitting.)

2010 Finish: 3rd
2010 Record: 80-82
2010 Pythagorean: 79-83
2011 Projection: 83-79
Difference: 3 Spiffy Busters

Kendry Morales is unlikely to break his leg again while celebrating a walk-off homerun.  That's about all I can say positive for the Angels who whiffed on every free agent on the market as God continues his retribution for 2002:

God's Retribution on the Angels
First: They crapped out in the playoffs (if they made it at all) every year since their Evil-Monkey-fueled championship.
Second:  Scott Speizio went and did this
Third: The rally monkey lost a "coolest monkey in the world" contest to this guy.
Fourth: They changed their name to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.  Pretty hard to maintain any level of dignity at that point.

2010 Finish: 4th
2010 Record: 61-101
2010 Pythagorean: 57-105
2011 Projection: 60-102
Difference: 1 Angry Brian

Stop trying to steal Timmy.  Stop trying to steal Timmy.  He doesn't want to go home.  He likes it here now.  He doesn't like the rain.  He hates mountains.  He feels uncomfortably close to Canada when he's with you.  You don't understand him.  You could have drafted him and you didn't.  You can't have him.  Go away. 

no comments